Corfman Clan wrote:I really don't know if Groundspeak is excited about this project or not. I do know that we are not planning to include any of the Pacific Northwest in the LCP to start with.
NICE!!!
Good one CC!!!!
Corfman Clan wrote:I really don't know if Groundspeak is excited about this project or not. I do know that we are not planning to include any of the Pacific Northwest in the LCP to start with.
I really hesitate to publish a release date, especially since this is essentially a hobby site and not a business. Redfist and I completely understand that there are quite a few people waiting patiently for this to go live and we really would like to do so sooner than later. I'm hoping that we can get the site branding completed soon. We're close but it's taking longer than I anticipated. Shortly after that we should be able to get access to the geocaching.com production database. Once we have that, it will take a bit before all the data are collected. I'm not yet sure at what rate we will turn things up but I can see it taking three weeks before we have the five SW states covered.cdsoccer7 wrote:...I am dying to find out if we have a reasonable ETA for the leaderboards? Not to pressure by any means, but a possible month/year or even a season and year would be awesome. If I have missed this info in a thread I apologize, ...slap my hands and direct me that way please. Thanks again,
cdsoccer7
I started a new topic to discuss scoring.kingbee wrote:How Are teams going to be scored?
First, I also give my accolades to the developers on this project. I hope everyone appreciates your effort.Taz wrote:I really appreciate the fact you guys are working on this and keep people posted on whats going on. I think that was about the most frustrating part of the DGP was the lack of communication. Thanks for all you are working on!
Even though the cache has not been found, it still is accumulating points. I do think we want to hilight the value of all caches, even when they haven't been found. Please realize that The Loneliest is just a list of the loneliest caches per cache type, it is not a leader board. We'll also have a way to see more than the top loneliest too, but the home page is just a summary. So for listing lonely caches, unfound caches also need to be scored and included.jcanyoneer wrote:Awesome! Great Job guys! I can't wait to be able to look at these type of stats again!
One question...On the Loneliest board, it's awesome to see this list by cache type-Great improvement over the old board...but, I thought that caches that had no finds were not going to be awarded points? Could/Should there be 2 boards here maybe? One that shows caches with actual points and one that shows caches with "potential" points?
Code: Select all
CacherID Name RegionID Job OverallPoints
77887 Beaster 1 1 136.93938357737
77887 Beaster 1 2 NULL
77887 Beaster 3 1 136.93938357737
77887 Beaster 3 2 NULLCode: Select all
SELECT [CacherID], g.Name ,[RegionID] ,[Job] ,[OverallPoints]
FROM [LonelyCacheProject].[dbo].[GeocacherPoints] p
join lonelycacheproject.dbo.geocacher g on g.id = p.cacherid
where CacherID=77887Go ahead and ask away. You may want to start a new topic though.rocketsciguy wrote:Looking good! Very excited for the first live release. I have many questions which I will refrain from bothering you guys with, so you have more time to get this finished!