LonelyCache

If looking for something on a web page, and that page has been changed, you might try web.archive.org (The Wayback Machine). If they pulled a page during the time that it had the info you are looking for, you might find it.

You can kinda hide that in the code, and if you make it complicated enough, nobody will notice.

I like it. It's another one that I'll never be on top of, but definately interesting.

I kinda like it too. Probably because I'm not a big fan of power trails anyway. There would be a slight drop in points for me on the caches that I do get because I just plain can't get to the really lonely ones. Just can't hike that far any more.

Same here. Mildly interesting, but no real effect for me either way. Of course, that could be because I'll never be at threat to any of the leaders anyway.

I agree with ZenGuru. I make use of some of those GSAK functions too and see no difference here. I see no down side to it.

If we have to use something other than the DGP regions, then I'd go with counties. The USGS quads are nice, but too small and they overlap the State boundries.

Personally like some version of a topo map best.

One of the few advantages of being low in the standings! Nobody used that against me! It was interesting info though.

This parking job!

MooseMob wrote:

Blue Roads wrote:How about the mountain with a hiker on top and a 4X at the bottom?

That wouldn't be true for my 4x4!

Could make it a 4x4 partially buried half way up! As in pics I've seen of a certain Nevada cache.

I'm in favor of using FDF. It is closest to what DGP did anyway, and it really isn't that important to me. I see the FTF as a personal stat anyway. I keep track just for my own information. As to the placement team logs, I've only been involved that way a few times. Didn't log finds on any of them. ...

How about the mountain with a hiker on top and a 4X at the bottom?